Legal Opinion

McBride v. Sun Life Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1926No. Appeal 187PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This was an action of assumpsit on a life insurance policy. The application for insurance contained certain questions, which were answered by the applicant— (Archibald McBride, the insured) — , as follows: “(8) Have you ever had consumption? No. (9) Give names of all physicians who have attended you within the past three years; on what dates and for what complaints? None. (10) Are you now in good health? Yes.” The policy contained the following provision, “STATEMENTS NOT WABBANTIES. The falsity of any statement in the Application for this Policy shall not affect the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cushman v. United States Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Billings v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  4. Barnes v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. White v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Adams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Baxter v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. New York Life Insurance v. W. Bodek Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Gimbel v. Aetna Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API