Legal Opinion
Park v. Fortune Partner, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 9, 2006No. A06A0567, A06A0568PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ellington, Judge.
Fortune Partner, Inc. andPu Cheng Chang (the “plaintiffs”) sued Chong Nam Park, Steven Cynn, Sun Hee Chung (the “defendants”), and PCK Vision, Inc. to recover on three promissory notes. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that the defendants had no defense to the $299,113.45 note obligation. The trial court, however, offset the defendants’ obligation by $200,000 because of plaintiff Chang’s unclean hands, and entered judgment in favor of Fortune and against the defendants, jointly and severally, for $99,113.45. On appeal, the defendants claim the trial court erred…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kusuma v. Metametrix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Page v. BraddyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Holmes v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Partain v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Tampa Bay Financial, Inc. v. NordeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monterrey Mexican Restaurant of Wise, Inc. v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Ellis v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Foreman v. Chattooga International Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Ansley v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.