Everett v. Continental Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Stearns county, entered upon the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an action upon defendant’s policy, in*77suring the plaintiff against loss or damage by fire on a certain threshing machine. In the application for insurance, the machine is described, first, as “ on Sec. 36, T. 23, R. 28,” and again as “stored in barn on Sec. 36, T. 23, R. 28, owned and insured by L. L. Chaffin.” In the policy, it is described as “threshing machine, S. 36, T. 23, R. 38,” reference being made, “ for more particular description, to the application.” The undisputed facts are that the barn of L. L. Chaffin was situate on Section 36, T. 33, R. 28, in Sherburne county in this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Mechanics' & Traders' Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by11 opinions
- Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
- Holbrook v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Noyes v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Kinney v. Farmers' Mutual Fire & Ins. SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- De Graff v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.