Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mechanics' & Traders' Fire Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This action is brought on a policy of insurance of $2,500, issued by defendants to Alexander Smith, and by him duly assigned to plaintiffs. The policy was upon one of several buildings adjoining or contiguous, and constituting an establishment known as “ Smith’s Carpet Factory.” The risk came under the class of special hazards, and the premium was at the rates charged for that class. The property insured is described in the policy in these words: “ $400 on his two-story framed building used for winding and coloring yarn and for storage of spun yarn, situate at West Farms, Westchester county,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jennings v. Chenango Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Germania Fire Insurance v. DeckardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Blumer v. Phœnix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Noyes v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  5. United States Fire & Marine Insurance v. KimberlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API