Schuh v. State

Carley, Judge.

Appellant was indicted and tried for unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. From his conviction, he brings this appeal. We affirm.

1. Appellant first attacks the charge to the jury as it relates to the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt. He does not contest the accuracy of the charge as given in this regard but, rather, urges that it was not complete and that, therefore, his requests to charge should have been given.

The United States Supreme Court has recently held: . . [T]he failure to…