Legal Opinion

Theroux v. O'Shea

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 18, 2008No. 060809EPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Troy, Paul E., J.

The plaintiff, Anka Theroux (The-roux) brought this action, consisting of twelve counts, against the defendant Marie O’Shea, individually and as owner of the Purple Cactus, all arising out of her claim of entitlement to one-half interest in O’Shea’s business and real property. The matter is before the court on O’Shea’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the defendant’s motion is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

Theroux and O’Shea, who owned a restaurant called the Purple Cactus, began a serious romantic relationship in March 2002, when Theroux…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Alba v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Green v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API