Legal Opinion

Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1974No. Docket No. 16597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

This appeal requires consideration of a standard automobile insurance policy clause. The direct issue is one of first impression in Michigan. Plaintiff-appellee, Bruce Nickerson (hereinafter plaintiff), seeks to confirm an arbitration award in his favor. Defendant-appellant, Citizens Mutual (hereinafter Citizens), claims that plaintiff was not covered by the policy.

The issue for decision is:

DOES THE PASSENGER OF A DISABLED AUTOMOBILE LOSE HIS STATUS AS AN "OCCUPANT” BY EXITING THE AUTOMOBILE AND REMAINING WITHOUT ANY CONTACT, IN FRONT OF THE AUTOMOBILE, WHILE AWAITING AID, IF THE POLICY…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Collins v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. OppedisanoNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McPherson v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Robson v. Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1978
  4. McPherson v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API