Legal Opinion

La Vasser v. Chesbrough Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by Philip La Vasser against the Chesbrough Lumber Company, a corporation, for breach of a lumber contract. Defendant filed a plea in abatement, which, was overruled. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

On March 27, 1912, plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant by the terms of which he undertook and agreed with said defendant to cut all of the pine and hemlock timber standing and lying on the lands described in said contract, and to deliver the same into the Tahquamenaw river, Chippewa county, Mich., which timber was estimated to be about 5,000,000 feet. The tract to be lumbered was a large one extending back from the Tahquamenaw river a distance of 3 or 4 miles. Under the terms of the contract plaintiff was to receive $7 per thousand feet for all timber cut and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StriblingMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hemminger v. Western Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad v. McCammonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Andreas v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kellogg v. Thompson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDannel v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Vantage Enterprises, Inc. v. CaldwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stokes v. Van SeventerAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Shank v. CastleMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Knoth v. A. Harvey's Sons Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API