Legal Opinion

Reitmeyer v. Reitmeyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1986No. 02260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the order modifying a previous support order and requiring appellant to pay $15 per week for the support of his daughter.

Appellant contends that: (1) the original support order should have been vacated as to appellant’s daughter when she became 18 years old because of her failure to comply with Pa.R.C.P. 1910.3 (1) and (4); (2) he was deprived of his right to due process by not being afforded a hearing on whether support for his daughter should have been vacated when she reached the age of 18, (3) the court below did not apply the correct method of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Emrick v. EmrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stump v. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Brake v. BrakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Shutter v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ryan v. DeLongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Marshall v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Lampa v. LampaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API