Lampa v. Lampa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order directing modification of child support for two minor children. Appellant, Mia Joy Lampa argues that the trial court improperly excluded from its consideration the legitimate expenses attendant to raising these children, and failed to follow the dictates of Melzer v. Witsberger, 505 Pa. 462, 480 A.2d 991 (1984) and county guidelines promulgated pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. § 4322. We agree, and accordingly reverse the trial court’s order and remand with directions for further proceedings.
The parties to this appeal were separated in 1981; appellant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Costello v. LeNoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshall v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lesko v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Com. Ex Rel. Sladek v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Steinmetz v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Caplan v. CaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.