Legal Opinion

EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY v. ASPEN FLOW CONTROL, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00295Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, ) ) ) 2:20-cv-295-NR Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ASPEN FLOW CONTROL, LLC, ) ) ) Defendant/Third-Party ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WORLDWIDE OILFIELD ) MACHINE, INC., and ROTORK ) CONTROLS, INC., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ORDER DENYING ROTORK’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS Rotork has moved to dismiss the claims brought against it by EQT in its amended complaint [ECF 62] and by Aspen in its crossclaims [ECF 69]. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments and applying the familiar Rule 12(b)(6) standard,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Altronics of Bethlehem, Inc. Altronics of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Repco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Goodman v. PPG Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Klein v. Council of Chemical AssociationsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Abbott Furnace Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API