Legal Opinion

Silber v. Bloodgood

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 9, 1922:

Owen, J.

The precise question presented is whether the defendants in their official capacity as deputy prohibition commissioners were authorized to force an entrance to the drawer, in which was concealed the contraband whisky. Sub. (29), sec. 1, ch. 441, Laws 1921, provides that nonintoxicating liquor shall not be sold or kept for sale without a license, therein .provided for, and sub. (30) of the same section provides that the prohibition commissioner, his deputies, or any peace officer may inspect such premises at any reasonable time without…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Finsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Plainos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. State v. DaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Ludwig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  5. Witek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API