Legal Opinion

CAREY W. HILL, Movant/Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2015No. SD33171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., C.J./P.J.

Carey W. Hill (“Hill”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Hill contends his plea was involuntary because he relied on incorrect information provided by his plea counsel, and because the charging instrument was defective. Finding no merit to these arguments, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

Factual and Procedural History

We set forth only those facts necessary to complete our review. In doing so, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the motion court’s judgment. McCauley v. State, 380 S.W.3d 657,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. DARREN S. SMITH II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Chrisman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. McCauley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rueger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Borneman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API