Legal Opinion

State v. Mosley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from, Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge. ■ (1) The alleged bill of exceptions in this case cannot be considered. It was not filed within the time allowed by the court, but after that time had expired. He was given until December 15, 1892, to file his bill of exceptions, and with the close of that day the record in his case closed. The judge, in vacation, could not at any time after December 15, 1892, extend the time for filing same.

Read the full summary

Appeal from, Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge. ■ (1) The alleged bill of exceptions in this case cannot be considered. It was not filed within the time allowed by the court, but after that time had expired. He was given until December 15, 1892, to file his bill of exceptions, and with the close of that day the record in his case closed. The judge, in vacation, could not at any time after December 15, 1892, extend the time for filing same. At the time he made the order, attempting to extend the time, the record had been closed and time expired for thirty-nine days. State v.…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

At the March term, 1892, of the Pemiscot circuit court, defendant was indicted, charged with having feloniously, willfully, premeditatedly, deliberately, on purpose and of his malice aforethought, shot and killed one Andy Seaton.

On March 17,1892, a certified copy of the indictment was delivered to defendant. The court and cause were adjourned and continued until July 25,1892, at which time defendant was duly arraigned and entered a plea of not guilty. The cause was again continued until the regular September term, 1892, at which term defendant was tried and convicted of murder in the first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AppersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. State v. PintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. State v. SeatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Powell v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. GracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Jewell Realty Co. v. DierksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API