Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of Beaverton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 1984No. 40-162; CA A24315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff, a former City of Beaverton police officer who retired because of an on-the-job physical disability, brought this action against the city seeking interpretation and specific performance of a disability provision contained in a collective bargaining agreement between the Beaverton Police Association and the city. The trial court granted the city’s motion for summary judgment on its affirmative defense that plaintiff had not complied with the grievance provisions of the agreement and, therefore, had no right to bring this action. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

Plaintiffs underlying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Knappenberger v. Cascade Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Valley State Bank v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Lake Oswego v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. City of Lake Oswego v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API