Legal Opinion

People v. Luksch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to afford her an opportunity to withdraw her plea before imposing an enhanced sentence (see, People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 241, cert denied 419 US 1122). That contention is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dremeguila, 166 AD2d 196, lv denied 76 NY2d 1020; People v Ifill, 108 AD2d 202, 203), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in

*896the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. IfillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. DremeguilaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. CouttsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. RigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. People v. Michael S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API