People v. Michael S.

Defendant contends that the court erred in failing to afford *805him an opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing an enhanced sentence (see, People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 241, cert denied 419 US 1122; People v Williams, 195 AD2d 1040, 1041; People v Scrivens, 175 AD2d 671, 672). Defendant did not object to the enhanced sentence or move to withdraw his plea and thus failed to preserve his contention for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Luksch, 265 AD2d 895, lv denied 94 NY2d 825; People v Wilson, 257 AD2d 674, lv denied 93 NY2d 981; People v Perry, 252 AD2d 990, lv denied 92 NY2d…