Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Britz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1996No. 76618Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE HARRISON,

specially concurring:

I agree with the result reached by the majority, but write separately because I disagree with the reasoning employed by my colleagues in rejecting petitioner’s Brandon claim.

In People v. Brandon, 162 Ill. 2d 450, 461 (1994), decided just two years ago, this court declared the language of section 104 — 21(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 104— 21(a)) to be clear and unambiguous. Now my colleagues have abruptly decided that a phrase in that statute, "other medications under medical direction,” cannot be plainly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BrandonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. KinkeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University v. Department of Human RightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Walker v. CroninAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API