People v. Kinkead
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW
In this appeal we revisit the circumstances under which a defendant who is being medicated with psychotropic drugs is entitled to a fitness hearing pursuant to section 104—21(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/104—21(a) (West 1992)). Recent precedent of this court has construed section 104—21(a) as conferring upon defendants, as a matter of entitlement, the right to a mental competency hearing if they are being given psychotropic drugs under medical supervision during the time of their prosecution or sentencing. (People v. Brandon (1994), 162 Ill. 2d 450; People v. Gevas…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. RissleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.