Legal Opinion

People v. Kinkead

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1995No. 75236PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

In this appeal we revisit the circumstances under which a defendant who is being medicated with psychotropic drugs is entitled to a fitness hearing pursuant to section 104—21(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/104—21(a) (West 1992)). Recent precedent of this court has construed section 104—21(a) as conferring upon defendants, as a matter of entitlement, the right to a mental competency hearing if they are being given psychotropic drugs under medical supervision during the time of their prosecution or sentencing. (People v. Brandon (1994), 162 Ill. 2d 450; People v. Gevas…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. People v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. RissleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API