Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided February 23, 1987No. Motion No. M-36429Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

On this motion, we address the propriety of the allocation of one claimant’s several actions to a single Judge under the individual assignment system (IAS).

David Holland has filed six separate claims, all of which seek to hold the defendant, State of New York, liable for alleged malfeasance in the management of its court system. *827Inter alia, a series of incidents are averred resulting in the "abrogation” of claimant’s constitutional rights and the perpetration of various torts upon him by judicial and nonjudicial officers. All the claims arose in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gabrelian v. GabrelianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Langan v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Plachte v. Bancroft Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Langan v. First Trust Deposit CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. BratenNew York Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API