Legal Opinion

In re B.J.T.H.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2015No. DA 14-0165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 S.H.V.H. (Mother) appeals from the Judgment entered by the Third Judicial District Court, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, finding that the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) complied with the counseling provisions of § 42-2-409, MCA. We affirm.

*15¶2 Mother presents the following issues for review:

1. Was there substantial evidence to support the District Court’s finding that, prior to signing an affidavit relinquishing her parental rights, Mother received counseling required by § 42-2-409(1) and (2), MCA?

2. Did the counselor produce a written report in compliance with the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re A.N.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re A.S.A.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. AragonMontana Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re J.A.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re K.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kohler v. KellerMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Matter of B.J.T.H. and B.H.T. H.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Matter of B.J.T.H. and B.H.T.H. YIMontana Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API