Legal Opinion

Estate of Downs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Testator left all of his property to his wife for life with the power to use the principal if necessary for her full enjoyment and support and after her death he provided that “all the remainder of my estate be divided equally between my children, share and share alike, the child or children of a deceased child to take by right of representation.” One son who survived testator died before the life tenant, leaving his wife, the appellant, as his heir at law. The question is whether the interest of this son passed to^ his heir or whether it was divested by his predeceasing the life tenant. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patton v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Roth v. KarstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Perkinson v. ClarkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Schroeter v. ReimersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mathiowetz v. StackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Company v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Jackson v. LangleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Colman v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rosenbaum v. Bishop Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Estate of WadleighWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API