Legal Opinion

McNichols v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1973No. 72-892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

279 So.2d 377 (1973)

Zebedee McNICHOLS, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

2Per curiam

The appellant has alleged prejudicial error in his trial because of the trial judge's refusal to allow a question to prospective jurors on voir dire examination. He relies upon the holding of the Supreme…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Pinder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  4. Beck v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CAS. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Ross, Jr. v. Theodore RistainoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. LongNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Beck v. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CAS. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. James Ross, Jr. v. Theodore RistainoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API