Legal Opinion

VanDyke Construction Co. v. Stillwater Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2003No. 02-798PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 VanDyke Construction Company, Inc. (VanDyke), contracted to construct a pipeline and widen a road for Stillwater Mining Company (Stillwater). VanDyke filed the underlying action after disputes arose concerning performance of the contracts. It now appeals from the order of the Sixth Judicial District Court, Sweet Grass County, which stayed litigation and compelled arbitration. We affirm.

¶2 The dispositive issue is whether the District Court erred when it concluded VanDyke waived its right to object to the arbitration provisions in its contracts with Stillwater. Because we hold the District…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tynes v. Bankers Life Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kingston v. Ameritrade, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Eddleman v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Firestone v. Oasis Telecommunications, Data & Records, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hurly v. Lake Cabin Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. R.C. Hobbs Enterprises, LLC v. J.G.L. Distributing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Collection Bureau Services, Inc. v. MorrowMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Peeler v. Rocky Mountain Log Homes Can., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API