Legal Opinion

Cataldo v. Winshall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1966No. Docket 369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover commissions and advances he claimed were due him from defendants. The nonjury trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff and against Jack I. "Winshall for $12,666.34 and a judgment of no cause for action as to defendants Bednarsh and Phyllis "Winshall. Jack I. Winshall appeals.

Defendant states the issues presented as follows:

1. “"Was the verdict and judgment of the court against the clear weight of the evidence as to the finding in favor of plaintiff on his complaint as to the following exhibits and claims, to-wit: * * * [Defendant then lists five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. E. P. Brady & Co. v. GillilandMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sabo v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Hoven v. HovenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Cataldo v. Winshall, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API