Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Snively, Unpublished Decision (10-10-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2001No. C.A. No. 3179-MUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made: Appellant, Noreen Snively, appeals the decision of the Medina Municipal Court denying her Civ.R. 60(B)(5) motion for relief from judgment. We affirm.

I

On April 7, 1998, appellee, Alan Parkhurst, filed a complaint in the trial court against Ms. Snively to recover his portion of the investment in the Cuyahoga Falls School of Floral Design, a business the two entered without a written agreement. Because Ms. Snively failed to answer the complaint, the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API