Legal Opinion

Brooke v. 8757 Rio San Diego Mission Valley Owner LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 18, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00975Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THERESA BROOKE, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00975-W-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED 14 8757 RIO SAN DIEGO MISSION AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. 9] VALLEY OWNER LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Theresa Brooke brings this action against Defendant 8757 Rio San Diego 21 Mission Valley Owner LLC. Defendants now move to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 22 Complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), arguing that Brooke 23 lacks standing.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API