Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Xtreme Truck Sales, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 2021No. A168527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 Argued and submitted May 9, 2019, reversed and remanded August 18, 2021 Adi D. MENDOZA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. XTREME TRUCK SALES, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Marion County Circuit Court 17CV36085; A168527

314 P3d 87

In this civil case, defendant appeals the trial court’s determination that its motion for attorney fees and costs under ORCP 54 E(3) was untimely. Defendant argues that the motion for fees was timely because it was not appealing the arbitrator’s decision, rather because the arbitrator’s award to plaintiff was less favorable than the offer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Elliott v. Progressive Halcyon InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Bhattacharyya v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Hawkins v. 1000 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayes v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Mendoza v. Xtreme Truck Sales, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Mayes v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Oregon State Hospital v. A. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API