Legal Opinion

State v. Ascolese

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

59 N.J. Super. 393 (1960)

157 A.2d 858

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

FELIX CARMEL ASCOLESE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1960.

Decided February 9, 1960.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.

Mr. William J. Murray argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Eugene T. Sharkey, of counsel; Mr. James M. Kenihan, on the brief).

Mr. Frank J.V. Gimino argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Lawrence A. Whipple, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Defendant, Felix Carmel Ascolese…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. State v. RaymondSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. State v. WitteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. State v. NagyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. State v. ArbusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. State v. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. State v. SlocumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. State v. HumphreyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API