Legal Opinion

Lewistown Propane Co. v. Moncur

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. 03-175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 The Moncurs appeal from the Tenth Judicial District Court’s denial of their Rule 60(b) motion. We affirm and remand.

ISSUE

¶2 The issue presented by the Moncurs on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying their Rule 60(b), M.R.Civ.P., Motion peremptorily and without opportunity for hearing.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 We resolved several issues between these parties in December 2002 in Lewistown Propane v. Moncur, 2002 MT 349, 313 Mont. 368, 61 P.3d 780 (Lewistown I). The issue in the case currently before us arose from the same transaction as the issues in the previous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewistown Propane Co. v. MoncurMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. S.T.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Northern Plains Resource Council v. Board of Health & Environmental SciencesMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fennessy v. DorringtonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Alpine Buffalo, Elk & Llama Ranch, Inc. v. AndersenMontana Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re P.D.L.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Paternity of C.T.E.-h.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Larango v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matter of P.D.L.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Paternity of C.T.E.-h.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API