Legal Opinion

Leatham v. Reger

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1919No. 3369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original application by W. A. Leatham against William-Reger and others for writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an original application to this court by the plaintiff against the defendants for a writ of mandate. An alternative writ was duly issued to which the defendants appeared and filed both a general demurrer and an answer. In view, however, that the answer presents no question of fact, the cause was heard and submitted upon the demurrer alone, and will be determined as though no answer had been interposed.

The application is made by the plaintiff pursuant to chapter 34, Laws of Utah 1919, which chapter is both an amendment and revision of sections 1700 to 1736, both inclusive, Comp. \ Laws…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Best Foods, Inc. v. Christensen, State Treas.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jardine v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. HawkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ogden City v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API