Frutiger v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1386OPINION
By the Court,
Young, J.:
Charles Dickens noted, we should “take nothing on its looks; take everything on evidence. There’s no better rule.” Charles Dickens, Great Expectations ch. XL (1861). Therefore, even after discerning all the facts from the evidence, we conclude that there was not sufficient evidence to support the indictment or conviction of Clinton Frutiger (“Frutiger”).
FACTS
The following is a summary of the evidence presented before the grand jury: Linda Walker (“Walker”), manager of the Regency Motel (“Regency”) in Reno, testified that on June 29, 1993, she rented room number…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Koza v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Azbill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Sefton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1956
- Hicks v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Tabish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Buchanan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Sheriff, Washoe County v. MiddletonNevada Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.