Legal Opinion

Security Finance Co. v. McGaskill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

With respect to the defense of fraud in the procurement of the notes sued on, it is nowhere alleged that the false representations, upon which defendant says he relied to his injury, were made with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity, nor is it alleged that such false representations were made with intent to deceive the defendant. The allegations, therefore, are insufficient to support the charge of fraud. Stone v. Milling Co., post, 585.

Furthermore, it is alleged that the defendant informed the salesman of the Brenard Manufacturing Company “he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Leonard v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Bell v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Coffing v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. . Logan and Logan v. . Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Barnes v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Forbes v. Drexel Knitting Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API