Legal Opinion

378 Realty Corp. v. New York City Rent & Rehabilitation Administration

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.

Defendants move pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings or in the alternative granting declaratory judgment in favor of the defendants pursuant to rule 113. Plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment in their favor. The action is brought for a declaration that so much of section 2 (subd. 2, par. [b]) of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1950, ch. 250) and subdivision 7 of section 3 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations of the Temporary State Housing Rent Commission as adopted and in effect on April 30, 1962…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H. Kauffman & Sons Saddlery Co. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Fablan Studios, Inc. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Noxon Operating Corp. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Sylarn Realty Corp. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API