Legal Opinion

In re D.S.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2006No. 2005-0992PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} The issue presented in this case is whether a juvenile court may require a child who was found delinquent because of committing crimes of a sexual nature *362to submit to “full disclosure” polygraph examinations as a condition of community control. We are also asked to examine the extent to which such a requirement implicates the rights of a child under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We hold that evidence must support the use of a polygraph for a particular juvenile before it is a reasonable community-control condition and that compelled…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API