Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. Auburn University Montgomery

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided April 22, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-00522-MEFPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion & Order

MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.

I.Introduction

This case involves claims of age, disability, race, and gender discrimination, as well as claims of fraud, hostile work environment, and retaliation. Before the Court is Defendant Auburn University Montgomery’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 6), filed on July 19, 2012. In its motion, Defendant Auburn University Montgomery (“Defendant” or “AUM”) contends that Plaintiff Mary Cardwell’s (“Plaintiff’) claims for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),1 the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),2 and 42…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin America Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  2. Federal Republic of Nigeria v. RossDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022
  3. Katzoff v. NCL BAHAMAS, LTD.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  4. Nugent v. Camus (MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
  5. Tunstall v. GlidewellDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API