Legal Opinion

Hall v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 19, 1978No. C-76-2090 RFPPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PECKHAM, Chief Judge.

This case is a class action challenge to the accelerated procedures utilized by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for the processing of discrimination charges during the Transitional Quarter (TQ) project. During the duration of the TQ project, from August 16, 1976 to September 30,1976, the Accelerated Procedures Memorandum of August 10, 1976 in effect modified the procedures of the EEOC’s Compliance Manual with regard to the processing of charges filed before July 1,1973. During the summer of 1976 before the TQ project, an EEOC inventory indicated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Susie J. Jackson v. Richards Medical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. Nazareen WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Gillis v. United States Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Lamoille Valley Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Eastern Magnesia Talc Company, State of Vermont, Intervenors. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, State of Vermont, Intervenors. State of Vermont v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., Robert W. Meserve, Intervenors. Canadian National Railway Company, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert W. Meserve and Benjamin H. Lacy, Trustees of the Property of Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API