Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Moss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1991No. 69253Published

1Dissent

OPALA, Chief Justice, with whom SIMMS, Justice, joins,

dissenting from the court’s failure to dismiss this appeal.

The court’s pronouncement holds, inter alia, that the plaintiff/appellant (FDIC) tenders for review an appealable decision. Although the adjudication from which corrective relief is sought gave the defendant/ appellee (Moss) “summary judgment” on his counterclaim for setoff, it left undetermined not only FDIC’s own claim but also other material issues raised by Moss’ quest for affirmative relief against FDIC. I would dismiss this appeal because (1) the decision before the court is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Tolson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API