Legal Opinion

Scott v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1997No. 29, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

This appeal concerns the pleading requirements for a claim of punitive damages. We are asked whether a complaint seeking monetary damages for a tort must make a specific claim for punitive damages and whether that complaint must set forth facts that, if proven true, would entitle the plaintiff to punitive damages. The answer to both questions is yes. Consequently, for the reasons explained below, we shall reverse the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

I

During the investigation of an assault and battery unrelated to the case sub judice, Prince George’s County Police…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Montgomery Ward v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Dow v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Shoemaker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Darcars Motors of Silver Spring, Inc. v. BorzymCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API