Legal Opinion
United States v. Erskine Hartwell
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 24, 2006No. 04-6214Published
1Opinion of the Court
448 F.3d 707
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Erskine HARTWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-6214.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued December 1, 2005.
Decided May 24, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Craig Weston Sampson, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. David John Novak, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of The United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Marc L. Resnick, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Brian L. Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.