Town of Lafayette v. City of Chippewa Falls
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The plaintiff-towns contend that the annexation ordinance is invalid for two reasons: (1) The majority of the qualified electors residing in the annexed area did not sign the petition as required for direct annexation by sec. 66.021 (2) (a), Stats.; and (2) the annexation was contrary to the rule of reason.
The plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in concluding that a majority of the electors residing at Northern Colony and Training School had signed the petition for direct annexation as required by sec. 66.021 (2) (a), Stats. 2 The general qualifications for electors are set forth in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Sampson v. LaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Edelman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Spiegelberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.