Legal Opinion

Town of Lafayette v. City of Chippewa Falls

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1975No. 113, 114 (1974)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The plaintiff-towns contend that the annexation ordinance is invalid for two reasons: (1) The majority of the qualified electors residing in the annexed area did not sign the petition as required for direct annexation by sec. 66.021 (2) (a), Stats.; and (2) the annexation was contrary to the rule of reason.

The plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in concluding that a majority of the electors residing at Northern Colony and Training School had signed the petition for direct annexation as required by sec. 66.021 (2) (a), Stats. 2 The general qualifications for electors are set forth in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sampson v. LaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Edelman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Spiegelberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API