Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cortada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 19, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

After a grievance hearing, claimant was discharged from her employment as a compliance agent for a municipal sanitation department for altering the dates on a physician’s note submitted to explain her absence from work. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she lost her employment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re the Claim of DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of QuackenbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API