Legal Opinion
Centimark Corporation v. Brycen Ribordy and Cherry Coatings Management, LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 4, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00987Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CENTIMARK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:25-cv-987 Vv. Hon. William 8S. Stickman IV BRYCEN RIBORDY and CHERRY COATINGS MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge On July 15, 2025, Plaintiff Centimark Corporation (“Centimark”) filed suit against Defendants Brycen Ribordy (“Ribordy”) and Cherry Coatings Management, LLC (“Cherry Coatings”), bringing claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (“DTSA”), the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Colleen Reilly v. City of HarrisburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Frank E. Acierno v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Brittan Holland v. Kelly RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.