Legal Opinion

Farson v. Hutchins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit for Money Had and Received.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The appellants’ brief makes the following statement of the case and their contentions:

“ This is an assumpsit suit, brought by the appellee to recover, under the common counts, upon a claim for money had and received. Appellants’ firm was the depository of a certain real estate contract and $1,000 earnest money connected with the sale of land. The contract itself provides that the earnest money shall be held by appellants for the mutual benefit of the parties thereto. About a month after the expiration of the time stipulated in the contract for its fulfillment, appellants turned over the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Elgin v. JoslynIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Johnson v. BantockIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. McDonald v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Lewis v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Staat v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shields v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Cahill v. PrintyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Shober & Carqueville Lithographing Co. v. SchedlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. Storrs v. TerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API