Legal Opinion

Edward Rezek v. City of Tustin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2017No. 15-55320UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Edward Rezek appeals from two district court orders: one dismissing his third amended complaint (TAC) against IPC Corporation and private security guards Jose Reyes and Hirineo Ibarra (IPC Defendants), without leave to amend; and another granting summary judgment in favor of Tustin police officers Brian Chupp and Mark Turner (Tustin Defendants). Re-zek alleges that while in a pedestrian crosswalk, he was almost hit by a private security vehicle driven by Jose Reyes. Re-zek “slapped” the vehicle and “gave Reyes a lecture.” Later, Rezek was arrested by Officers Chupp and Turner for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ciria v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  2. Johnson v. AltamiranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Kevin Cairns v. County of El DoradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Santana v. County of YubaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API