Legal Opinion

George v. Holt

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court, by

Judd, O.J.

At the July Term, 1892, of this Court an action of ejectment was tried wherein Mrs. Hanakaulani Holt recovered of one Keolo (w) a piece of land situate on Queen street, Honolulu, being a portion of the land described in Boyal Patent No. 1730 to Kekuhaupio.

Thereafter one Kawai K. George brought an action of ejectment against Mrs. Hanakaulani Holt to recover possession of land under the same Boyal Patent. The jury having disagreed at the October Term, 1892, the case came up for trial at the February Term, 1893, of the Circuit Court, First 'Circuit, Whiting,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keahi v. BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mossman v. Hawaiian GovernmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hewahewa v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Smith v. Hamakua Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Tibbetts v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Dowsett Co. v. McCandlessHawaii Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API