Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Mota

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1984No. 82-1069; CA A27213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution decree. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to order wife to pay child support, in ordering him to pay her permanent spousal support and in failing to consider the costs of sale of the family home in the property distribution. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The parties have five children, four of whom are not involved here. Husband was awarded custody of the fifth child, age 13. The trial court found that he was able to support that child and that wife was unable to support herself or the child. Accordingly, the court declined to order her to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of SellersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of WestbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of ClappertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of KenyonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Marriage of MilburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API