Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co. v. Barzune
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentUooney, J.
I dissent from that part of the decision of the majority reversing the judgment in favor of appellee for $168.50 and interest, being the. amount of money extracted by the criminal from the safe, hence believe the judgment below should have been affirmed in its entirety.
The risk assumed by appellant is described in its policy as follows: “For all loss by burglary of money, securities and merchandise, as hereinafter defined, by its abstraction from within that part of any safe or vault to which the insurance under this policy applies, by any person or persons mak ing felonious entry into sucli…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- T. J. Bruner Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- National Surety Co. v. ChalkleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Moskovitz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Rosenbach v. National Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.