Legal Opinion

Blount v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 1956No. 36196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The plaintiffs insist that the action was not predicated upon the written contract which was introduced in evidence, but was based upon an oral agreement between the parties to sell the property which was made prior to the execution of the written contract. Parol negotiations and stipulations preceding the male ing of a written contract are merged in the written contract. Logan v. Bond, 13 Ga. 192 (3); Freeman v. Bass, 34 Ga. 355 (4); Sims v. Crawford, 56 Ga. 31. The written contract governs the rights, obligations and remedies of the parties. In the present case R. S. Freeman testified that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Logan v. BondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  2. Nutting & Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Rowland v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Freeman v. BassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  5. Kiser Real Estate Co. v. Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Denard & Moore Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Satellite Syndicated Systems, Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API