In re Gibson
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Carol A. Doyle, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Tyrome Gibson seeks confirmation of his chapter 13 plan. The chapter 13 trustee objects because the plan does not require the debtor to pay to the trustee any future income tax “refunds” he receives as additional plan payments. The trustee’s objection is overruled. The debtor prorated the expected income from his tax “refund” over 12 months and' properly calculated his plan payment. He is not required to pay future income tax “refunds” to the trustee. His plan will be confirmed.
I. Background
The issue in this case is how to treat…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hardy v. Fink (In re Hardy)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- In re MoralesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marilyn Marshall v. Denise BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- In re BlakeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re: Jewel CarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Marilyn Marshall v. Denise BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018